+1. Some of my smaller changes has been "ignored" due to larger active JIRAs ;). It would speed things up if I can push these in myself after a +1.
Respectfully, Tuong ----- Original Message ----- From: Gregory Chanan <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 5:41 PM Subject: Re: Proposed Change in Sentry Commit Guidelines/Process +1. What's the purpose of the "Reviewed by" given we could find that information on the JIRA? Greg On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Lenni Kuff <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I would like to propose a change in the Sentry commit process > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SENTRY/How+to+commit#Howtocommit-Committingpatches > >. > Currently, the process recommends that the contributor and person who > pushes the code change are different people, with the following > exception: "Committers may have to bypass the long drawn process to commit > the change in order to fix a broken build, or work through a release etc." > > I suggest that we relax this restriction to make it acceptable for a > comitter to push their own change, as long as it has a +1 from another > committer on the project. The commit messages for these changes should > always include a new "(Reviewed by: <Name of Reviewer>)". > > The motivation is to improve the velocity with which changes can be > submitted, while retaining the same level of quality for the project. > > Please let me know if you object to this proposed change. > > Thanks, > Lenni >
