-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29238/#review71535
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



sentry-core/sentry-core-model-search/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/core/model/search/SearchConstants.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29238/#comment117276>

    used to distinguish...



sentry-provider/sentry-provider-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/common/AuthorizationComponent.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29238/#comment117277>

    Grammar. Maybe "Component being authorized by Sentry"? 
    
    Also, HIVE is very specific (it excludes Impala). Perhaps "SQL" or "DB"



sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/service/thrift/SearchPolicyServiceClient.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29238/#comment117278>

    Why do you have an enum for AuthorizationComponent when you are using it 
like a String? Either change AithorizationComponent to be string constants or 
make this an enum.



sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/service/thrift/SearchProviderBackend.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29238/#comment117279>

    Add class comment.



sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/service/thrift/SearchProviderBackend.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/29238/#comment117280>

    Would it make this easier to use if you could call initialize multiple 
times?


- Lenni Kuff


On Jan. 30, 2015, 5:55 a.m., shen guoquan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29238/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 30, 2015, 5:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Xiaomeng Huang, Colin Ma, Dapeng Sun, Gregory 
> Chanan, and Vamsee Yarlagadda.
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Currently Solr does support index-level security via sentry with file as 
> backend privilege store. Using file as the backend store is simple, but there 
> has some disadvantages as followings:
> 1. Can't satisfied with the needs of dynamically add, delete and update 
> permissions
> 2. Can't be centrally managed and difficult to maintain
> According to the above disadvantages, The Solr Sentry plug-in integration 
> with DB store is demanded. The Hive Sentry plug-in has already integration 
> with DB store, but the Hive authorization model is different from the Solr 
> authorization model.So this new feature depends on the generic authorization 
> model(SENTRY-398).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   sentry-binding/sentry-binding-solr/pom.xml 2dfc933 
>   
> sentry-core/sentry-core-model-search/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/core/model/search/SearchConstants.java
>  7a39b79 
>   
> sentry-policy/sentry-policy-search/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/policy/search/SimpleSearchPolicyEngine.java
>  f428aea 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/common/AuthorizationComponent.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/service/thrift/SearchPolicyServiceClient.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/service/thrift/SearchProviderBackend.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29238/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All tests have passed through the local jenkins environment.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> shen guoquan
> 
>

Reply via email to