Created jira version hive_plugin_v2 for patches going into the feature
branch.

thanks
Prasad


On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Gregory Chanan <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 then.
>
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >   It's suppose to be exclusive to Hive binding. It's refactoring the Hive
> > binding implementation to use the new authorization interface in Hive
> > instead of the old compiler hooks. By design it should not be impacted by
> > other component changes except the SQL model or provider interfaces.
> > Typically when a feature is worked on a a separate branch, it's should be
> > the responsibility of the contributor to keep the branch in sync before
> it
> > comes to merge.
> >
> > thanks
> > Prasad
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Gregory Chanan <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Is this feature exclusive to Hive?  Do I have to worry that I make a
> > > general to Sentry, I'll break the Hive v2 integration?
> > >
> > > Greg
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Sravya Tirukkovalur <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for a separate branch
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <
> [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >   Here's my +1 for the record.
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like we have a good consensus. @Dapeng, please go ahead and
> > > create
> > > > a
> > > > > branch for the feature.
> > > > > We'll also need a jira version to track the patches going into the
> > > > branch.
> > > > > I can set that up in the jira. It might be a good idea to create a
> > > > separate
> > > > > task jira for merging this into master once the work is completed
> and
> > > > > reviewed etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > Prasad
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Shen, Guoquan <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > Guoquan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Sun, Dapeng [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 4:51 PM
> > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Creating feature branch for SENTRY-498
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank Prasad for starting this thread.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for creating a new branch.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > Dapeng
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Ma, Junjie [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 4:42 PM
> > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Creating feature branch for SENTRY-498
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are 12 subtasks for this features, and may be more in the
> > > future.
> > > > > > I'm agree to create a new branch for this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Colin Ma(Ma Jun Jie)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Prasad Mujumdar [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, June 5, 2015 4:36 PM
> > > > > > To: dev
> > > > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Creating feature branch for SENTRY-498
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    Dapeng Sun is continuing the work on "SENTRY-498 : Sentry
> > > > > authorization
> > > > > > V2 via Hive authorization framework". Looks like this will be
> > fairly
> > > > > large
> > > > > > code change of refactoring of the Hive plugin to make it work
> with
> > > new
> > > > V2
> > > > > > auth framework in Apache Hive. We think it would be better to
> > develop
> > > > > this
> > > > > > on a separate feature branch [1].
> > > > > > Please let us know if that sounds reasonable approach.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] -  [
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14571970#comment-14571970
> > > > > >  ]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks
> > > > > > Prasad
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sravya Tirukkovalur
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to