Guoquan,

Yes, tagname conventions are mentioned in this section
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SENTRY/How+to+Release#HowtoRelease-Createreleasetarballs>.
You can basically create a tag release-1.5.0, this would be a RC. If the
vote passes then this becomes the release tag, if not we delete the tag and
recreate the rc tag with the same name (release-1.5.0).

Does that make sense?

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Shen, Guoquan <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks for your help to verify the rc1, @colin and @Sravya. The following
> problems Sravya mentioned I will take over and fix it. But I have some
> puzzle about the problem item 2.
> Hi @Sravya, you said it was recommend to delete the old tag and recreate a
> new one. Take this release for example, I currently send the voting email
> on the 1.5.0-rc1. If none is oppose to this
> 1.5.0-rc1, this candidate will be final release. But according to your
> suggestion, I should delete the rc1 tag and recreate a tag 1.5.0. That's
> the question I want to ask for help. When I create a new tag 1.5.0,
> Should I need to send the voting email on new tag 1.5.0. Thanks.
>
> Regard
> gqshen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sravya Tirukkovalur [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 5:17 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry incubating version 1.5.0 (rc1)
>
> Verified following:
>
>    - Format is in apache-$project-$version-incubating.tar.gz
>    - Verified Signatures and hashes
>    - git tag matches the released bits (diff -rf)
>    - Can compile successfully from source
>    - Verify DISCLAIMER, NOTICE and LICENCE (year etc)
>    - All files have correct headers (Rat check should be clean - mvn
> verify)
>    - No jar files or the like in the release
>
>
> Some minor issues:
>
>    1. It was recommended to host the RC bits @
>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sentry as mentioned in
>    this thread
>    <
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201506.mbox/%3C87800125-0A58-43DA-A2DB-718B16232200%40me.com%3E
> >.
>    Also it is mentioned in our how to release wiki:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SENTRY/How+to+Release#HowtoRelease-Uploadartifacts
>    2. It was actually recommended in one of our previous release to delete
>    the old tag and recreate the new tag, our wiki also reflects this.
>    3. Changelog is not upto date, looks like there are atleast a couple
>    jiras missing:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314720&version=12327461
>
>
> -1, due to above issues. @Guoquan: Will it be possible to fix the above
> issues? Although I think some of the above are not release blockers, I
> think it would be better to fix them.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Ma, Junjie <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I checked the checksums, LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, get the tarball,
> > compiled and ran the tests.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Colin Ma(Ma Jun Jie)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: gqshen [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 9:49 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Sentry incubating version 1.5.0 (rc1)
> >
> > This is the incubator release of Apache Sentry, version 1.5.0-incubating.
> >
> > The list of fixed issues, added features and improvements can be found
> > here:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.txt;h=5d96434653aa292dfd025c7baa876013e95a5a15;hb=refs/heads/branch-1.5.0
> >
> > Source files : http://people.apache.org/~gqshen/sentry-1.5.0-rc1/
> >
> > Tag to be voted on (release 1.5.0-rc1/SHA:
> > 3bf4ece59d8c4bc05ba96e4c9fab8b768e95b090):
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=commit;h=3bf4ece59d8c4bc05ba96e4c9fab8b768e95b090
> > Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/sentry/KEYS
> >
> > Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source:
> > tag=release-1.5.0-rc1, SHA=3bf4ece59d8c4bc05ba96e4c9fab8b768e95b090
> >
> > Vote will be opened for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Thank you for your prompt votes.
> >
> > Thanks to Prasad and Sravya for all your help and guidance...
> >
> > Respectfully,
> > Sentry 1.5.0 Release Manager (Guoquan Shen)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sravya Tirukkovalur
>



-- 
Sravya Tirukkovalur

Reply via email to