Making a new release, deleting 1.5.0 from dist.a.o will ensure that's the
only one currently available aside from the archive.a.o copy

On Monday, June 22, 2015, Sravya Tirukkovalur <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ah ok.
>
> So do we make a new release, say 1.5.1? But how do we deprecate/ defunct
> 1.5.0 release?
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:14 AM, David Nalley <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > -1
> > 1.5.0 already exists for better or worse.
> > https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/sentry/1.5.0-incubating/
> >
> > We can't release the same version even if there are issues with the
> > version we did release.
> >
> > --David
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:48 PM, gqshen <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > This is the incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
> 1.5.0-incubating.
> > >
> > > The list of fixed issues, added features and improvements can be found
> > here:
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.txt;h=5d96434653aa292dfd025c7baa876013e95a5a15;hb=refs/heads/branch-1.5.0
> > >
> > > Source files : http://people.apache.org/~gqshen/sentry-1.5.0-rc1/
> > >
> > > Tag to be voted on (release 1.5.0-rc1/SHA:
> > > 3bf4ece59d8c4bc05ba96e4c9fab8b768e95b090):
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=commit;h=3bf4ece59d8c4bc05ba96e4c9fab8b768e95b090
> > > Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/sentry/KEYS
> > >
> > > Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the
> source:
> > > tag=release-1.5.0-rc1, SHA=3bf4ece59d8c4bc05ba96e4c9fab8b768e95b090
> > >
> > > Vote will be opened for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > Thank you for your prompt votes.
> > >
> > > Thanks to Prasad and Sravya for all your help and guidance...
> > >
> > > Respectfully,
> > > Sentry 1.5.0 Release Manager (Guoquan Shen)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sravya Tirukkovalur
>

Reply via email to