On 7 September 2015 at 12:28, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > How about: stop the debate? Remove it for 1.4.x (done), and bring it back > for 1.5.x? ... The stuff I was doing on trunk for 2.x, I will move to a > branch. Trunk will be 1.x. > That would be hard to do, because we had to introduce read_bucket_v3() in this case. I think the mess doesn't worth it.
> There is no reason to keep get_remaining in 1.4. It sounds like we have > further work to keep compatibility regardless. Some Windows linkage thing, > that I don't entirely understand. > We have problem with read_bucket_v2() approach [1] to detect buckets with newer compatibility: we don't have guarantee that function pointers are the same for library itself and library users on unix. As far I understand this how LD works. We use this functionality for get_remaining() *and* bucket config store. [1] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/serf-dev/DtemuQPk2BE/Q86oGn7LlXkJ -- Ivan Zhakov
