Hello guys: I read the amazing blog "Eventual Data Consistency Solution in ServiceComb - part 2" and I'm kind of confused about these two statements:
> Saga does not provide ACID guarantee, because atomicity and isolation are not satisfied .... > With durable saga log, saga guarantees consistency and durability I guess the first statement is talking about how so called "Transaction" behaves in **Saga pattern**. And the second statement is talking about the implementation of Saga's state store. But that's a little strange to say "Saga provides C and D because it's state store provides C and D". I think Saga pattern actually does not guarantee either of A, C, I or D. Am I right? -- Daniel Qian
