We could specify it in the environment setup document. @Cherry Could you share the experience of Lombok usage in sharding sphere?
Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:13 PM, wjm wjm <[email protected]> wrote: > everyone clone our code, if need to load by IDE, must install the IDE > plugin, i don't think it's a good idear. > > 2018-08-22 12:33 GMT+08:00 Zheng Feng <[email protected]>: > > > It looks good to me and the lombok supports the JDK 9 ? > > > > 2018-08-22 12:21 GMT+08:00 赵俊 <[email protected]>: > > > > > Hi, Willem > > > > > > Lombok would not package into our service-comb jar, so there is no > > license > > > issue. > > > We can set the maven scope is “provide”, it just enhance the java code > > > byte in compile step. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 21 Aug 2018, at 10:57 PM, wjm wjm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > in fact, getter / setter and so on can be generated by IDE(IntelliJ / > > > > Eclipse) simply > > > > > > > > 2018-08-21 22:34 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > >> Hi Cherry, > > > >> > > > >> Thanks for proposal, it can save us lot of time when we write the > java > > > bean > > > >> class. > > > >> As lombok is using MIT license, I don't think we could have the > > license > > > >> issue here. > > > >> > > > >> I think we can start it from saga project, it's up to java-chassis > to > > > check > > > >> if it want to use it. > > > >> > > > >> @Team Any thought? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Willem Jiang > > > >> > > > >> Twitter: willemjiang > > > >> Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:58 PM, cherrylzhao <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi, all > > > >>> > > > >>> Lombok can simplify our work for creating java entity. > > > >>> Using Lombok annotation, it will enhance java byte code within > > compile > > > >>> step. > > > >>> We can use @Getter @Setter @Log @RequiredArgsConstructor to define > > our > > > >>> model simplify. > > > >>> See more detail from https://projectlombok.org < > > > >> https://projectlombok.org/ > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> any thought? > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
