Yeah, that is exactly what I'm thinking about. The new git repo could be Pack, we can implement different Transaction protocal there. And the current Saga code could have a dependency of it or we just move the Pack related code to Pack repo.
Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:28 PM Zheng Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the core implementation of TCC and Saga (Pack) have the same > things, such as the similar annotations and the event names. So does it > make sense to have the common core module to implement the transaction > context, transaction event and the grpc communication protocol ? > And we could provide the different APIs or annotations for both the TCC and > the Saga or maybe the other distribute transaction protocol. Also we could > make a new roadmap to make it as a framework used in the microservice to > resolve the transaction things. > > Anyway, I totally agree with Willem to separate the TCC and the Saga codes > at the first step. And what is the next ? Maybe we need a new name for the > repo ? > > Regards, > Zheng Feng > > Willem Jiang <[email protected]> 于2018年10月23日周二 下午2:54写道： > > > Hi Team， > > > > As TCC is quite different with the Saga implementation. > > I'm planning to move the Pack code and TCC related code out of Saga repo. > > In this way we can just keep Saga repo to have the implementation for Saga. > > > > Any thought？ > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:27 PM Willem Jiang <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, once we plan to support the TCC in the Saga project , we need to > > consider to rename the project name. > > > Current we have two different implementation of Saga, one is centric > > Saga, the other is based the Pack (Omega/Alpha). > > > Now we implement the TCC protocol on top of Pack architecture. > > > > > > Maybe we can rearrange the package name base on this Architecture and > > move the Pack code to another repo. > > > Any thought? > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:09 PM fu chengeng <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi all. > > >> as we all knows that,saga is a kind of transaction agreement,And we > > named this project as saga because we support only this kind of agreement. > > >> But now,we are going to support tcc, and maybe many other > > transaction agreement like xa will be supported. > > >> Whether we should change saga to other name to prevent confused > > when it is in incubating? > > >> > > >> > >
