Can we put them all in one project so that we can release all components together?
We can separate them in different modules in saga project. I think we can use SAGA as the name for this project which implements BASE transactions(saga, tcc, etc. ) although saga is one of them in history. ------------------ ???????? ------------------ ??????: "willem.jiang"<[email protected]>; ????????: 2018??10??23??(??????) ????7:31 ??????: "dev"<[email protected]>; ????: Re: Is saga named right? Yeah, that is exactly what I'm thinking about. The new git repo could be Pack, we can implement different Transaction protocal there. And the current Saga code could have a dependency of it or we just move the Pack related code to Pack repo. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: ????willem On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:28 PM Zheng Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the core implementation of TCC and Saga (Pack) have the same > things, such as the similar annotations and the event names. So does it > make sense to have the common core module to implement the transaction > context, transaction event and the grpc communication protocol ? > And we could provide the different APIs or annotations for both the TCC and > the Saga or maybe the other distribute transaction protocol. Also we could > make a new roadmap to make it as a framework used in the microservice to > resolve the transaction things. > > Anyway, I totally agree with Willem to separate the TCC and the Saga codes > at the first step. And what is the next ? Maybe we need a new name for the > repo ? > > Regards, > Zheng Feng > > Willem Jiang <[email protected]> ??2018??10??23?????? ????2:54?????? > > > Hi Team?? > > > > As TCC is quite different with the Saga implementation. > > I'm planning to move the Pack code and TCC related code out of Saga repo. > > In this way we can just keep Saga repo to have the implementation for Saga. > > > > Any thought?? > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > Weibo: ????willem > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:27 PM Willem Jiang <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, once we plan to support the TCC in the Saga project , we need to > > consider to rename the project name. > > > Current we have two different implementation of Saga, one is centric > > Saga, the other is based the Pack (Omega/Alpha). > > > Now we implement the TCC protocol on top of Pack architecture. > > > > > > Maybe we can rearrange the package name base on this Architecture and > > move the Pack code to another repo. > > > Any thought? > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > > Weibo: ????willem > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:09 PM fu chengeng <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi all. > > >> as we all knows that,saga is a kind of transaction agreement,And we > > named this project as saga because we support only this kind of agreement. > > >> But now,we are going to support tcc, and maybe many other > > transaction agreement like xa will be supported. > > >> Whether we should change saga to other name to prevent confused > > when it is in incubating? > > >> > > >> > >
