do we have a mechanism to use the configuration with high performance？ Xiaoliang Tian <xiaoliang.t...@gmail.com> 于2019年3月29日周五 下午5:27写道：
> sure, mainly forcus on management , ease of use, rollback, key value > version control. value validation. > > first we support API, later UX. > > bismy <bi...@qq.com> 于2019年3月29日周五 下午4:08写道： > > > Provide a centered configuration management service is very important for > > ServiceComb, because all microservice governance functions are based on > > dynamic properties. In ServiceComb microservice view, now we currently > use > > following functions( implement archaius api using apollo and > config-center) > > > > > > * pull/push configurations of key-value pair from configuration > service. > > > > > > in microservice view, no future functions is needed. So I guess the > > suggested service mainly focus on management functions. How do you decide > > to provide this functions? Add a management console or by REST api? > > > > > > ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ > > 发件人: "Xiaoliang Tian"<xiaoliang.t...@gmail.com>; > > 发送时间: 2019年3月29日(星期五) 下午2:14 > > 收件人: "dev"<dev@servicecomb.apache.org>; > > > > 主题: Re: [PROPOSAL] ServiceComb MetaConfig > > > > > > > > let's think how we change a timeout for a particular operation? > > the key is xxx.usermanagement.user.getuser.timeout, is that key easy to > be > > manged by operator? I guess he has to learn a special key rule only make > > sense in his team > > > > I want this timeout just be timeout, and easy to read > > it bacame timeout(service= usermanagement , > schema=user,opertion=getuser) > > > > Xiaoliang Tian <xiaoliang.t...@gmail.com> 于2019年3月29日周五 下午12:15写道： > > > > > > > > maybe the name confused，it is a service only for configurations，but the > > key contains metadata > > > key1: log_level(service=cart, version=1.0, app=mall) > > > key2: log_level(service=cart, version=1.0, app=mall, ip=x.x.x.x) > > > that is 2 different keys > > > > > > you can consider apollo has fixed metadata and one fixed view to math > > > their own scenario. > > > > > > but in apollo, key can be very complicated, user can not easily > observe > > > keys, a lot of metadata will be attacted to key name, just like ip to > > > "log_level" > > > > > > Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com> 于2019年3月29日周五 上午11:36写道： > > > > > >> Hi Xiaoliang, > > >> > > >> Do you propose we start a new project to manage the micro services > meta > > >> datas? > > >> Currently we just have a solution to integrate with with Apollo for > > >> configuration management, but what's the difference between the > > >> service metadata and configuration? > > >> I could help us to understand the proposal, if we can drop a clear > line > > >> for it. > > >> > > >> > > >> Willem Jiang > > >> > > >> Twitter: willemjiang > > >> Weibo: 姜宁willem > > >> > > >> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:52 AM Xiaoliang Tian > > >> <xiaoliang.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > MetaConfig is a service for configuration management in an large > > >> scaled > > >> > distrbuted system. > > >> > > > >> > Currently we use ctrip appllo for config managment, but it is build > > for > > >> a > > >> > paticular scenario. it has fixed schema > > >> application,environment,cluster and > > >> > namespace. Each key belong to that schema. > > >> > > > >> > But it is not enough for operator to manage a complicated > > >> infrasctructure > > >> > or application cluster. > > >> > > > >> > So here is the proposal to build a brand new config management > > service, > > >> > > > >> > *Features: * > > >> > *key with rich metadata: *user can define metadata for a key , that > > >> > distinguish from key to another key. a key will not be stringed by > > >> fixed > > >> > schema. metadata is like "env=test, service=cart, version=1.0" or > > >> > "cluster=xxx" or "env=test, service=cart, version=1.0, ip=x.x.x.x" > > >> > *validator: *value can be checked by user defined python script, so > in > > >> > runtine if someone want to change this value, the script will check > if > > >> this > > >> > value is properate. > > >> > *encryption webhook: *. value can by ecrypt by your custom > encryption > > >> > service. > > >> > *event producer: *producer will send key changes event to a target > > >> > service(kafka,rabbitmq, customed). > > >> > *config view: *by setting metadata criteria, MetaConfig will > > aggregate a > > >> > view to return all key values which match those metadata, so that > > >> operator > > >> > can mange key in their own understading to a distributed system in > > >> > seperated views. > > >> > *config batch action: * with metadate, you can batch update, delete > > key > > >> > values. for example: update all "service=cart version=1.0" > > configuration > > >> > log level to "DEBUG" or just update "service=cart version=1.0, > > >> ip=x.x.x.x" > > >> > . > > >> > *rich value type: *not ony plain text any more, but support to be > > aware > > >> of > > >> > ini, json,yaml,xml and java properties > > >> > *heterogenous configuration system: *able to manage configuration in > > k8s > > >> > and consul or even more, you can update, delete, and use config view > > for > > >> > those systems, and you can integrate with your own config system to > > >> > MetaConfig by following standardized API and model > > >> > > > >
