OK, I will start a vote for it shortly.
Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:48 AM Zhang Lei <zhang_...@boco.com.cn> wrote: > > I agree that alpha only supports spring boot 2.x. However, it is recommended > that Omega support both spring boot 1.x and spring boot 2.x. > Maybe we only need to include spring boot 2.x in the release version, so we > only need to perform the acceptance test of spring boot 2.x version, but > allow users to compile omega of spring boot 1.x version. > > Lei Zhang > > > 在 2019年7月17日，上午9:58，Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > Current we are running the two profiles spring-boot-1.x and > > spring-boot-2.x to verify Spring boot version for Alpha and Omega > > side. > > As Spring boot 2.1 is out for a while, it should be fine we just > > provide Sprint boot 2.x support on Alpha side, and Spring Boot 1.x > > and Spring 2.x support on the client side. > > The challenge part is we may need run Accept test for spring boot 1.x > > and spring boot 2.x omega, if we release the spring boot 1.x support > > of omega. > > > > Do we still need to provide sprint boot 1.x support on omega side? >
