I think it does not affect the existing main process, so it can be merged.

Wishes & Regards
-------------------------------
Mabin



Daniel Qian <chanjars...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月7日周四 上午9:03写道:

> Hi Ma, what I have done is:
> 1. 3rd-party LICENSE information is merged
> 2. connect the pom.xml together so it can be built from project root dir
> 3. check style functionality he integrated into cli
> So from the perspective of building and distribution, it's been integrated.
> But from the perspective of functionality, it's not finished yet.
> So if we don't care about the functionality, I think it's good to go.
> BTW, merge as early as possible is a good idea to avoid future merge
> conflicts
>
> Bin Ma <mabin1...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月6日周三 下午8:15写道:
> >
> > I found that the integration work has been completed and merged,
> > so I think we can start to merge the import-oas-validator branch to
> > master.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> >
> > Wishes & Regards
> > -------------------------------
> > Mabin
> >
> >
> >
> > Daniel Qian <chanjars...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月5日周二 下午1:39写道:
> >
> > > Hi Ma, got it.
> > >
> > > Bin Ma <mabin1...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月5日周二 上午11:19写道:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I misread the question.
> > > >
> > > > I think it's better to support both checkcompatibility and cc as
> > > > subcommands.
> > > >
> > > > Wishes & Regards
> > > > -------------------------------
> > > > Mabin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > sen sun <asd992825...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月5日周二 上午9:40写道:
> > > >
> > > > > I think Ma just made an example of the option naming style instead
> of
> > > the
> > > > > subcommand.
> > > > > I think it's a good idea to support both checkcompatibility and cc
> as
> > > > > subcommands.
> > > > >
> > > > > Daniel Qian <chanjars...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月5日周二 上午7:28写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello Ma, found current cli style is <subcommand> <options>.
> > > > > > So if we do --check-compatability then which subcommand should we
> > > use?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bin Ma <mabin1...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月5日周二 上午12:44写道:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I recommend keeping the same as the current option naming
> style,
> > > > > > > such as "-c", "-- check-compability "
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Wishes & Regards
> > > > > > > -------------------------------
> > > > > > > Mabin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月1日周五 下午12:31写道:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think we can support checkcompatibility and the short one
> cc
> > > at the
> > > > > > same
> > > > > > > > time.
> > > > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Willem Jiang
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang
> > > > > > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:37 AM Daniel Qian <
> > > chanjars...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I created an issue SCB-1555[1] to integrate oas-validator
> > > > > > > > > compatibility check to toolkit cli.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I suggest usage like this:
> > > > > > > > > java -jar toolkit-cli-{version}.jar checkcompability
> > > > > > > > > /path/to/openapiv3-1.yaml /path/to/openapiv3-2.yaml
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But the subcommand checkcompability is too long, maybe we
> can
> > > use a
> > > > > > > > > abbr for it, such as cc?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-1555
> > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-toolkit/blob/import-oas-validator/oas-validator/README.md#%E5%85%BC%E5%AE%B9%E6%80%A7%E6%A3%80%E6%9F%A5
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Daniel Qian
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 博客:https://segmentfault.com/u/chanjarster
> > > > > > > > > github:https://github.com/chanjarster
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Daniel Qian
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 博客:https://segmentfault.com/u/chanjarster
> > > > > > github:https://github.com/chanjarster
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Qian
> > >
> > > 博客:https://segmentfault.com/u/chanjarster
> > > github:https://github.com/chanjarster
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Qian
>
> blog:https://chanjarster.github.io
> github:https://github.com/chanjarster
> segmentfault: https://segmentfault.com/u/chanjarster
>

Reply via email to