On Nov 30, 2007 7:54 PM, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 3:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems there's no major objections, so I will start moving the svn
> tree
> > for servicemix 3 and servicemix 4 on monday, though I won't touch the
> smx4
> > tree now (just move it). We can talk about the exact smx4 tree at a
> later
> > time.
> > If there are any objections please speak now!
>
> I think it would be wise to draw up a plan on the wiki for this before
> doing the changes. Mainly because I think it's *highly* important to
> understand how this will affect the release process and therefore the
> ServiceMix end users. Only then can we adequately convey the changes
> to the ServiceMix user base - but this should all happen before the
> changes take place. We need to tell them exactly what is going to
> happen, why it's going to happen and how it will affect them before,
> during and after all this work occurs.
>
Sounds good. I don't much troubles for ServiceMix 3.x users (as a simple svn
switch should be enough), and I doubt there are lots of ServiceMix 4 users
around here... But we can formalize things a bit more.
>
> It shouldn't be too difficult to do this and I'm glad to help.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
> Castor - http://castor.org/
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
