To be honest and realistic, I don't expect all the felix jars we need to be
released before one or two months.
On Dec 19, 2007 2:27 PM, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 12:42 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like us to think about releasing a first version of ServiceMix
> Runtime.
> > However, we are dependant on a number of snapshots, mainly coming from
> Felix
> > (gshell is about to be released, as are the two geronimo spec jars).
> > It doesn't looks like they will release the Felix snapshots in the
> coming
> > days, so we can either:
> > 1) not release anything
> > 2) keep snapshot dependencies
> > 3) internally release timestamped versions of the felix jars
> >
> > I don't like any of those solutions, so I welcome any opinion
>
> If it's truly going to be a few days, then I'd say wait those few days
> to release the milestone. But don't overlook the fact that the
> milestone needs docs all over it explaining that it is a milestone and
> experimental, etc., etc. I recall doing this with the first few
> Geronimo milestone releases and this wasn't explained well and some
> people were really upset by it because they understood the milestones
> to be real releases, not a peak at the experimental stuff.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
> Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
>
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
