+1

Thanks
Jeff

On Dec 20, 2007 5:36 PM, Freeman Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > Actually, I'd rather go 3 (release timestamped versions of felix jars we
> > need and put them in our own repo) and release a 1.0-m1.  Thoughts ?
> >
> > On Dec 19, 2007 10:18 AM, Gert Vanthienen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Guillaume,
> >>
> >>
> >> Couldn't we do another milestone release (e.g. 1.0-M1) and keep the
> >> snapshot dependencies for now, releasing a final 1.0 version as soon as
> >> final versions are available for all the dependencies?  This way, we
> can
> >> ship a 'pre-first' release to our user base to get some feedback
> without
> >> having to depend on SNAPSHOTs in our final release.
> >>
> >>
> >> Gert
> >>
> >>
> >> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'd like us to think about releasing a first version of ServiceMix
> >>>
> >> Runtime.
> >>
> >>> However, we are dependant on a number of snapshots, mainly coming from
> >>>
> >> Felix
> >>
> >>> (gshell is about to be released, as are the two geronimo spec jars).
> >>> It doesn't looks like they will release the Felix snapshots in the
> >>>
> >> coming
> >>
> >>> days, so we can either:
> >>>   1) not release anything
> >>>   2) keep snapshot dependencies
> >>>   3) internally release timestamped versions of the felix jars
> >>>
> >>> I don't like any of those solutions, so I welcome any opinion
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
Thanks
Jeff

Reply via email to