+1 for staying with dm 1.2.0-m2
Lars Guillaume Nodet schrieb: > Releasing both camel and cxf based components sounds good. > > For Smx4, we have a choice we need to discuss and settle asap. Some > time ago, servicemix kernel and components have been upgraded to > spring-dm 1.2.0-m2. The changes on the spring configuration file used > when deploying the components in servicemix 4 is incompatible with > spring-dm 1.1.x. So in order to release servicemix 4, we have to > either: > * release all components with spring-dm 1.2.0-m2 configuration > * revert components and kernel to spring-dm 1.1.x > * wait for spring dm 1.2.0 ga before releasing kernel + components > > I'm not really in favor of #3. If we don't want to release all > components, we can revert back to spring-dm 1.1.x. The new feature of > spring-dm 1.2.0 is mainly the ability to have updates in the osgi > configuration admin propagated dynamically to spring beans, but we > haven't leveraged that yet, so reverting is not a big deal at this > point. > However, we need to choose quickly. > > 2009/2/12 Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]>: > >> L.S., >> >> A while back, we separated the components into a separate build so they >> could be shared between ServiceMix 3 and ServiceMix 4, but we also made >> every component a Maven project on its own to allow them to be released >> independently. Up to now, we didn't really leverage all the hard work that >> was done to make this happen, but we might have a good opportunity to start >> the habit now: >> - Camel 1.6.0 is being voted and we don't even have a Camel 1.5.0 component >> in Servicemix, so we could do with a release of servicemix-camel >> - I guess the same also goes for CXF, we should be able to release a new CXF >> component whenever CXF itself is released >> >> On the other hand, I think we are also waiting for a Spring DM 1.2.0 release >> to get a full set of components released again, so it might be better to >> just wait a little while and do a full component release once more before we >> start our new best habit. >> >> Once again: thought? suggestions? >> >> Regards, >> >> Gert >> >> > > > >
