+1 to stay with spring-dm 1.2.0-m2 On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Lars Heinemann <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for staying with dm 1.2.0-m2 > > > Lars > > > > Guillaume Nodet schrieb: > > Releasing both camel and cxf based components sounds good. > > > > For Smx4, we have a choice we need to discuss and settle asap. Some > > time ago, servicemix kernel and components have been upgraded to > > spring-dm 1.2.0-m2. The changes on the spring configuration file used > > when deploying the components in servicemix 4 is incompatible with > > spring-dm 1.1.x. So in order to release servicemix 4, we have to > > either: > > * release all components with spring-dm 1.2.0-m2 configuration > > * revert components and kernel to spring-dm 1.1.x > > * wait for spring dm 1.2.0 ga before releasing kernel + components > > > > I'm not really in favor of #3. If we don't want to release all > > components, we can revert back to spring-dm 1.1.x. The new feature of > > spring-dm 1.2.0 is mainly the ability to have updates in the osgi > > configuration admin propagated dynamically to spring beans, but we > > haven't leveraged that yet, so reverting is not a big deal at this > > point. > > However, we need to choose quickly. > > > > 2009/2/12 Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]>: > > > >> L.S., > >> > >> A while back, we separated the components into a separate build so they > could be shared between ServiceMix 3 and ServiceMix 4, but we also made > every component a Maven project on its own to allow them to be released > independently. Up to now, we didn't really leverage all the hard work that > was done to make this happen, but we might have a good opportunity to start > the habit now: > >> - Camel 1.6.0 is being voted and we don't even have a Camel 1.5.0 > component in Servicemix, so we could do with a release of servicemix-camel > >> - I guess the same also goes for CXF, we should be able to release a new > CXF component whenever CXF itself is released > >> > >> On the other hand, I think we are also waiting for a Spring DM 1.2.0 > release to get a full set of components released again, so it might be > better to just wait a little while and do a full component release once more > before we start our new best habit. > >> > >> Once again: thought? suggestions? > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Gert > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
