2009/7/9 Jamie G. <[email protected]>: > A branch for the transition to Karaf would be good.
Well should we have a branch for the old kernel-based features and NMR, and simply rebase the trunk on Karaf? As opposed to putting the Karaf port on a branch and leaving the trunk based on the old kernel. Cheers, Eoghan 2009/7/9 Jamie G. <[email protected]>: > A branch for the transition to Karaf would be good. There are several > users that have experienced issues with the SMX Kernel on AIX that > don't exist when using Felix Karaf. It would be nice for those SMX4 > users to be able to try out the rebased code. > > Jamie > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes, we can start porting to Karaf now I think. >> Not sure if we really need a branch but it might be better to create >> one now, even if we don't use them. >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:58, Eoghan Glynn<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Folks, >>> >>> Apologies if this question has been raised before, but I wondered >>> whether there's a concrete plan for rebasing the features and NMR >>> modules on Karaf as opposed to the old SMX4 Kernel? >>> >>> If so, would this involve maintaining a Kernel-based branch for >>> features and NMR? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Eoghan >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> >
