Yeah, I think trunk should be switched to karaf and keep a maintenance branch for the kernel based stuff.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 14:36, Eoghan Glynn<[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/7/9 Jamie G. <[email protected]>: >> A branch for the transition to Karaf would be good. > > Well should we have a branch for the old kernel-based features and > NMR, and simply rebase the trunk on Karaf? > > As opposed to putting the Karaf port on a branch and leaving the trunk > based on the old kernel. > > Cheers, > Eoghan > > 2009/7/9 Jamie G. <[email protected]>: >> A branch for the transition to Karaf would be good. There are several >> users that have experienced issues with the SMX Kernel on AIX that >> don't exist when using Felix Karaf. It would be nice for those SMX4 >> users to be able to try out the rebased code. >> >> Jamie >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Yes, we can start porting to Karaf now I think. >>> Not sure if we really need a branch but it might be better to create >>> one now, even if we don't use them. >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:58, Eoghan Glynn<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> Apologies if this question has been raised before, but I wondered >>>> whether there's a concrete plan for rebasing the features and NMR >>>> modules on Karaf as opposed to the old SMX4 Kernel? >>>> >>>> If so, would this involve maintaining a Kernel-based branch for >>>> features and NMR? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Eoghan >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Guillaume Nodet >>> ------------------------ >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> ------------------------ >>> Open Source SOA >>> http://fusesource.com >>> >> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
