Guillaume,
Will we be keeping the admin command that creates scripts called start
and stop under an instances/ directory? Should that be consistent too?
Aidan
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
What you describe might be interesting, but is a really different
issue that may even be implemented in karaf rather than servicemix.
I was really thinking about just renaming the scripts, nothing more for now.
So you would run bin/servicemix instead of bin/karaf
That was the case previously, but has been changed since the switch to
karaf, so it'd be just about reverting to the previous names.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 17:24, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> wrote:
Guillaume,
What do you plan to do ? Provide different shell scripts to start the
server with or without NMR, with or without JBI. I don't like that we
have too much shell scripts in the bin folder
To stay consistent with what have been done in the past SMX3/beginning
of SMX4 server, it makes more sense to keep servicemix name (even if
this script do the same thing as karaf.bat).
Nevertheless, what I propose, is to have a parameter who will allow
the user to start the server in the prefered mode :
servicemix.bat -mode=nmr / camel / jbi / cluster / ...
Charles Moulliard
Senior Enterprise Architect
Apache Camel Committer
*****************************
blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
I wonder if we should rename the shell scripts to start the nmr /
features distribution to
nmr.sh / nmr.bat
servicemix.sh / servicemix.bat
instead of karaf / karaf.bat
Thoughts ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
