Well, we actually already have a sandbox opened to committers ? I did not
remember it was set up like that.

Eric, feel free to create your own tree in the servicemix sandbox and hack
at will there ! :-)

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 15:38, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Friday 22 October 2010 9:27:43 am Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 15:19, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Friday 22 October 2010 9:10:01 am Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > > > Dan, Given Eric is not a committer, I don't see any other way if he
> > > > wants to get started.
> > >
> > > Create a sandbox open to all Apache committers.  Several projects have
> > > them,
> > > including CXF, Maven,   etc...  Trivial to setup.
> >
> > Right, good idea.  Do you know how to set that up ? With the new ldap
> > permissions, i'm not quite sure how the svn permissions is set up now.
>
> No ldap needed, just edit the asf-authorization-template file.  The CXF
> entry:
>
> [/cxf]
> @cxf = rw
>
> [/cxf/sandbox]
> @committers  = rw
>
>
>
> > > What I was trying to suggest was to see if scalate can get stuck into
> the
> > > CMS
> > > there somehow instead of the Perl templating thing they have now.   I
> > > THINK you would still be able to use the "svn checked out" type form,
> > > but for others, you could just use the web frontend and not bother with
> > > svn checkouts,
> > > commits, etc....    Was just a thought.   That said, I don't know how
> > > "ready"
> > > it is yet.    Possibly something to investigate later.
> >
> > Yeah, the svn based is really one of the important thing imho.  It makes
> it
> > way easier to submit patches.  Also, from what i read, the CMS is bound
> to
> > markdown atm,
>
> Well, it associates file extensions with a process to run somehow.   If you
> edit a file with extension "mdtext", it uses the Perl thing, but it
> supposedly
> can be extended for a bunch of other things.    See:
>
> http://www.staging.apache.org/dev/cms.html#templating
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> > I actually did not really understand where the value was, but
> > I may have missed something.  It looks to me that scalate is way more
> > powerful.
> >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 15:00, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > On Friday 22 October 2010 8:40:35 am Eric Johnson wrote:
> > > > > > Would it make sense to start a github project
> > > > >
> > > > > Only if you want your next board report to say SMX collaboration is
> > > > > happening
> > > > > at GitHub.    Hint:  that won't go over well.
> > > > >
> > > > > > and start hacking together a
> > > > > > scalate version of the static site incorporating the design ideas
> > >
> > > being
> > >
> > > > > > offered? (I suggest scalate because the Apache infrastructure
> team
> > > > > > is deprecating Confluence due to lack of maintenance on the
> static
> > > > > > site
> > > > >
> > > > > export
> > > > >
> > > > > > plug-in.)
> > > > >
> > > > > What MAY actually be an interesting idea is to approach INFRA and
> ask
> > >
> > > for
> > >
> > > > > some
> > > > > details on the new CMS.   It supposedly has a pluggable
> > > > > template/markup system, but I don't know how "pluggable" it really
> > > > > is (like is a JVM allowed).
> > > > > All the content would be in SVN so folks could contribute that way
> or
> > >
> > > use
> > >
> > > > > the
> > > > > web gui thing, it supports staging, etc...     Just a thought.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dan
> > > > >
> > > > > > I think this is a decent summary:
> > > > > > * Landing page should have big boxes for download, doc, contrib
> > > > > > (the
> > > > >
> > > > > things
> > > > >
> > > > > > most visitors want to see)
> > > > > > * News panel on landing page
> > > > > > * live updating twitter feed on landing page
> > > > > > * simpler navigation
> > > > > > * better overview of ServiceMix to disambiguate between 3.x and
> 4.x
> > > > > > * organize site so that a user knows if content is for 3.x or 4.x
> > > > > > * make navigation easier
> > > > > >
> > > > > > anything else?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2010/10/22 Łukasz Dywicki <[email protected]>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > Thank you very much for response and ideas. Bide for next proto
> > >
> > > soon
> > >
> > > > > [1]!
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Lukasz
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] Soon = Wednesday
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 9:12 AM
> > > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Discussion] Design update
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > JB
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 10/22/2010 03:58 AM, Freeman-2 wrote:
> > > > > > > > Strongly +1 for activity stream on the welcome page.
> > > > > > > > Just like Karaf already put twitter in, pull dynamically what
> > > > > > > > people say about "servicemix"
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Freeman
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Daniel Kulp
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://dankulp.com/blog
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Kulp
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://dankulp.com/blog
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [email protected]
> http://dankulp.com/blog
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to