Though I like the visual effect of the proposal a lot, I wonder about
a missing news section and a missing link + logo to the ASF web site
(even though it's not a requirement, I think it's a good thing to add
the feather logo somewhere).
Also note that the ASF web site (http://apache.org/) now has an
activity widget which merges twitter, jira and svn commits.  Maybe
that's something we'd want to use instead of separate sections?

2010/11/5 Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]>:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> Sorry for the late reply -- these images are really starting to look
> better every time!  I really think this design is getting very close
> to the end result and we should start to integrate things into the
> website20 sandbox project.  I love the general look and feel, the
> images and icons in the boxes, the way a new user is guided to the
> downloads/docs/community from his/her first visit, the fact that we
> also have a window on what's happening in twitter/blogosphere/jira/...
>
> Just a few minor things about this last proposal:
> - I'd make the blue bar on the top slightly lower, there's no need for
> the search box to be 3 x the height of the letters
> - I'm not sure about the big 'Leading enterprise service bus...' image
> at the top
> - The blue box around the home navigation item looks a bit big
> compared to everything else in the header, perhaps we can find another
> way to highlight the current page?
> - We'd have to find a way to make the three boxes at the bottom look a
> bit more similar, but we can probably do that by replacing the widgets
> with a little RSS javascript thingy though
>
> Anyway, if we can get this thing worked out over the next few weeks so
> it can go live together with the new release, that will be an awesome
> achievement for the ServiceMix community.
>
> Thanks for all the hard work you're putting into these proposals!
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> 2010/11/3 Łukasz Dywicki <[email protected]>:
>> Hi all,
>> I have all ideas connected into one page:
>> http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/1718/servicemix46.jpg
>>
>> Please take a look and let us know - is it nice and what could be done
>> better.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Lukasz
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eric Johnson [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 12:48 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Discussion] Design update
>>
>> I created a barebones project at
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/website20
>>
>> Right now it is just the sitegen sample from the scalate distro. I plan on
>> hacking it into something more over the weekend.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Eric Johnson
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Will do.
>>>
>>> On Friday, October 22, 2010, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Well, we actually already have a sandbox opened to committers ? I did
>> not
>>> > remember it was set up like that.
>>> >
>>> > Eric, feel free to create your own tree in the servicemix sandbox and
>>> hack
>>> > at will there ! :-)
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 15:38, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Friday 22 October 2010 9:27:43 am Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> >> > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 15:19, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > > On Friday 22 October 2010 9:10:01 am Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>> >> > > > Dan, Given Eric is not a committer, I don't see any other way if
>>> he
>>> >> > > > wants to get started.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Create a sandbox open to all Apache committers.  Several projects
>>> have
>>> >> > > them,
>>> >> > > including CXF, Maven,   etc...  Trivial to setup.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Right, good idea.  Do you know how to set that up ? With the new ldap
>>> >> > permissions, i'm not quite sure how the svn permissions is set up
>> now.
>>> >>
>>> >> No ldap needed, just edit the asf-authorization-template file.  The CXF
>>> >> entry:
>>> >>
>>> >> [/cxf]
>>> >> @cxf = rw
>>> >>
>>> >> [/cxf/sandbox]
>>> >> @committers  = rw
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > > What I was trying to suggest was to see if scalate can get stuck
>>> into
>>> >> the
>>> >> > > CMS
>>> >> > > there somehow instead of the Perl templating thing they have now.
>>> I
>>> >> > > THINK you would still be able to use the "svn checked out" type
>>> form,
>>> >> > > but for others, you could just use the web frontend and not bother
>>> with
>>> >> > > svn checkouts,
>>> >> > > commits, etc....    Was just a thought.   That said, I don't know
>>> how
>>> >> > > "ready"
>>> >> > > it is yet.    Possibly something to investigate later.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Yeah, the svn based is really one of the important thing imho.  It
>>> makes
>>> >> it
>>> >> > way easier to submit patches.  Also, from what i read, the CMS is
>>> bound
>>> >> to
>>> >> > markdown atm,
>>> >>
>>> >> Well, it associates file extensions with a process to run somehow.   If
>>> you
>>> >> edit a file with extension "mdtext", it uses the Perl thing, but it
>>> >> supposedly
>>> >> can be extended for a bunch of other things.    See:
>>> >>
>>> >> http://www.staging.apache.org/dev/cms.html#templating
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Dan
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > I actually did not really understand where the value was, but
>>> >> > I may have missed something.  It looks to me that scalate is way more
>>> >> > powerful.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > Dan
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 15:00, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > > On Friday 22 October 2010 8:40:35 am Eric Johnson wrote:
>>> >> > > > > > Would it make sense to start a github project
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > Only if you want your next board report to say SMX
>> collaboration
>>> is
>>> >> > > > > happening
>>> >> > > > > at GitHub.    Hint:  that won't go over well.
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > and start hacking together a
>>> >> > > > > > scalate version of the static site incorporating the design
>>> ideas
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > being
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > > > > offered? (I suggest scalate because the Apache infrastructure
>>> >> team
>>> >> > > > > > is deprecating Confluence due to lack of maintenance on the
>>> >> static
>>> >> > > > > > site
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > export
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > > plug-in.)
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > What MAY actually be an interesting idea is to approach INFRA
>>> and
>>> >> ask
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > for
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > > > some
>>> >> > > > > details on the new CMS.   It supposedly has a pluggable
>>> >> > > > > template/markup system, but I don't know how "pluggable" it
>>> really
>>> >> > > > > is (like is a JVM allowed).
>>> >> > > > > All the content would be in SVN so folks could contribute that
>>> way
>>> >> or
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > use
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > > > the
>>> >> > > > > web gui thing, it supports stagin--
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Guillaume Nodet
>>> > ------------------------
>>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> > ------------------------
>>> > Open Source SOA
>>> > http://fusesource.com
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Principle Technical Writer
>>>
>>> Phone (781) 280-4174
>>> Skype finnmccumial
>>> E-Mail [email protected]
>>> Blog http://documentingit.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Principle Technical Writer
>>
>> Phone (781) 280-4174
>> Skype finnmccumial
>> E-Mail [email protected]
>> Blog http://documentingit.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to