Jean-Baptiste, Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty 6.1.25 then? If there are no API changes involved, we can still do this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually released anything, especially if there are significant bugs/improvements in the newer version.
Regards, Gert Vanthienen ------------------------ Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: jbonofre > Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010 > New Revision: 1028290 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev > Log: > Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22. > You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty performances. > > Modified: > servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml > > Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original) > +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010 > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ > <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version> > <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version> > <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version> > - <jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version> > + <jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version> > <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version> > <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version> > <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version> > > >
