Hi Jean

Sorry of posting directly to you on the dev forum but my gmail has
"Reply to all" as default.

I have posted on the dev since and Camel 2.5 do have Jetty 6.1 in the
camel-cxf feature for OSGi.
But then again it would be nice to align that version number with SMX
if possible.

But on the same time we know gnodet works on making karaf smarter in
terms of when installing features and being able to pick existing
bundles which fit.
So this we most likely be better in the future so camel-cxf feature
will be able to pickup and just use the jetty bundle already installed
by SMX.



On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> regarding platform/karaf features, I quick checked and I've seen
> jetty6.bundle.version used.
>
> Let me check again :)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 10/28/2010 05:17 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>
>> Camel 2.5 uses Jetty 7 in the camel-jetty component.
>>
>> Its CXF 2.2 which are using Jetty 6.1.x.
>> CXF 2.3 has been upgraded to use Jetty 7 AFAIR
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> It was my plan, but:
>>> - Karaf 2.1.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>> - Camel 2.5.0 uses jetty 6.1.22
>>>
>>> So, if I upgrade servicemix-http and SMX4 features to jetty 6.1.25, it
>>> means
>>> that we will have two jetty bundles in the system repo (and runtime).
>>>
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 10/28/2010 04:19 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't it be better if we upgraded all the other bits to Jetty
>>>> 6.1.25 then?  If there are no API changes involved, we can still do
>>>> this while we're preparing for the 4.3.0 release and haven't actually
>>>> released anything, especially if there are significant
>>>> bugs/improvements in the newer version.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:31 PM,<[email protected]>    wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Author: jbonofre
>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>>> New Revision: 1028290
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028290&view=rev
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> Downgrade Jetty version as other SMX modules still use Jetty 6.1.22.
>>>>> You should upgrade to 6.1.25 which fixes issue around Jetty
>>>>> performances.
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>    servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>> URL:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml?rev=1028290&r1=1028289&r2=1028290&view=diff
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>>>> +++ servicemix/smx3/trunk/pom.xml Thu Oct 28 13:31:12 2010
>>>>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>>>>>         <activeio-version>3.1.2</activeio-version>
>>>>>         <camel-version>2.5-SNAPSHOT</camel-version>
>>>>>         <jencks-version>2.2</jencks-version>
>>>>> -<jetty-version>6.1.25</jetty-version>
>>>>> +<jetty-version>6.1.22</jetty-version>
>>>>>         <jetty-servlet-api-version>6.1.14</jetty-servlet-api-version>
>>>>>         <geronimo-version>2.0.2</geronimo-version>
>>>>>
>>>>> <geronimo-annotation-version>1.1.1</geronimo-annotation-version>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/

Reply via email to