Jean-Baptiste,
For the 4.4.1 release, I think I would prefer to reuse the 2011.02 components set (as well as all the other dependencies) unless there's a critical issue to fix in there - that way, we can can easily/quickly deliver a new version of ServiceMix to get people on the latest versions of Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x without having to redo the entire release cycle. Other fixes going into the components, utils, ... trunk will be picked up when we do the Apache ServiceMix 4.5.0 release, which we probably should start planning that one right after the 4.4.1 release is out. I was hoping to be able to include ActiveMQ 5.6.0 but I'll check back with them on an ETA on that one - if it's too far out, we can always go with Camel 2.9.x, CXF 2.5.x and ActiveMQ 5.5.1 instead. Anyway, this is just my 2 cents here - wdyt? Regards, Gert Vanthienen ------------------------ FuseSource Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Gert, > > I'm gonna make a build/run on my machine and let you know. > I have a couple of fixes that I would like to add to the components, but > it's not a big deal or release stopper. > > Regards > JB > > > On 01/30/2012 05:00 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote: > >> L.S., >> >> >> Today, the Camel 2.8.4 release was promoted into central repo so I >> upgraded >> our features 4.4.x build to CXF 2.4.6 and Camel 2.8.4. The resulting kits >> seem to work fine on my machine, with no duplicate features repositories >> being listed or any other kind of oddities, so I think we're good to go >> for >> our ServiceMix 4.4.1 release. Does anyone have anything else that needs >> to >> go into that release? >> >> @Jean-Baptiste: I noticed the release issue is currently assigned to you >> but if you still have your hands full with the bundles release you're >> doing, I'll gladly help out and cut the features release somewhere in the >> next few days. >> >> P.S. In the process of doing the upgrades, I accidentally created >> duplicate >> issues for these upgrades because Jean-Baptiste already created those as >> well - made a note-to-self to look harder for existing issues next time >> around ;) >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Gert Vanthienen >> ------------------------ >> FuseSource >> Web: http://fusesource.com >> Blog: >> http://gertvanthienen.**blogspot.com/<http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/> >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
