L.S., If that's OK for everyone, I'll cut the 4.4.1 release tomorrow (upgrading the 4.4.x release to Camel 2.8.4 and CXF 2.4.6)
Regards, Gert Vanthienen ------------------------ FuseSource Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/ On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > ServiceMix 4.4.1 still use Karaf 2.2.x, so blueprint 0.3.x for now (not > 0.4). Anyway, we are waiting for a Aries Blueprint 0.4.1 on the Karaf side. > > Regards > JB > > > On 01/30/2012 11:19 PM, geaaru wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> my 2 cent: >> >> - I don't know if it is possible but I think that could be a valid >> improvement resolve issue about use of cxf inside blueprint.xml in offline >> environment (with default gw configured). Blueprint is more powerfull on >> osgi instead of spring and currently it is only possible use spring with >> cxf on production environment where default gw is available but filtered. >> >> This problem probably will be resolved with blueprint-0.4.x that isn't >> yet scheduled for release... So', happy release of smx-4.4.1, at least for >> me. >> >> Bye. >> G. >> >> On Mon Jan 30 2012 09:55:42 PM CET, Gert Vanthienen<gert.vanthienen@** >> gmail.com <[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Jean-Baptiste, >>> >>> >>> For the 4.4.1 release, I think I would prefer to reuse the 2011.02 >>> components set (as well as all the other dependencies) unless there's a >>> critical issue to fix in there - that way, we can can easily/quickly >>> deliver a new version of ServiceMix to get people on the latest versions >>> of Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x without having to redo the entire release >>> cycle. >>> >>> Other fixes going into the components, utils, ... trunk will be picked up >>> when we do the Apache ServiceMix 4.5.0 release, which we probably should >>> start planning that one right after the 4.4.1 release is out. I was >>> hoping to be able to include ActiveMQ 5.6.0 but I'll check back with >>> them on an ETA on that one - if it's too far out, we can always go with >>> Camel 2.9.x, CXF 2.5.x and ActiveMQ 5.5.1 instead. >>> >>> Anyway, this is just my 2 cents here - wdyt? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Gert Vanthienen >>> ------------------------ >>> FuseSource >>> Web: http://fusesource.com >>> Blog: >>> http://gertvanthienen.**blogspot.com/<http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>> Hi Gert, >>>> >>>> I'm gonna make a build/run on my machine and let you know. >>>> I have a couple of fixes that I would like to add to the components, >>>> but it's not a big deal or release stopper. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> >>>> On 01/30/2012 05:00 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote: >>>> >>>> L.S., >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Today, the Camel 2.8.4 release was promoted into central repo so I >>>>> upgraded >>>>> our features 4.4.x build to CXF 2.4.6 and Camel 2.8.4. The >>>>> resulting kits seem to work fine on my machine, with no duplicate >>>>> features repositories being listed or any other kind of oddities, so >>>>> I think we're good to go for >>>>> our ServiceMix 4.4.1 release. Does anyone have anything else that >>>>> needs to >>>>> go into that release? >>>>> >>>>> @Jean-Baptiste: I noticed the release issue is currently assigned to >>>>> you but if you still have your hands full with the bundles release >>>>> you're doing, I'll gladly help out and cut the features release >>>>> somewhere in the next few days. >>>>> >>>>> P.S. In the process of doing the upgrades, I accidentally created >>>>> duplicate >>>>> issues for these upgrades because Jean-Baptiste already created >>>>> those as well - made a note-to-self to look harder for existing >>>>> issues next time around ;) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Gert Vanthienen >>>>> ------------------------ >>>>> FuseSource >>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com >>>>> Blog: >>>>> http://gertvanthienen.**blogsp**ot.com/ <http://blogspot.com/>< >>>>> http://gertvanthienen.**blogspot.com/<http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>> >>>> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
