Hi Gert, it sounds good to me.
I will work on it with you all guys. Regards JB On 02/13/2014 09:53 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
L.S., Moving the discussion from the users@ to dev@ mailing list, it would be good to figure out how to go about things. For now, I would propose we avoid adding any extra complexity and just focus on getting a simple assembly project in place that combines the latest and greatest bits of ActiveMQ, CXF, Camel, Karaf, ... How about we start with the ServiceMix 5 codebase, remove the new Camel interceptor bits for now and just focus on getting the assembly itself, the examples and the integration tests working? That way, we should have a fairly manageable amount of work to perform before we can get to a new release. We have a board report coming up in March, so we can convey this new direction in that. Perhaps we should use the next board report after that as a checkpoint to see if we are making any progress: by then, I think we should have been able to do at least one or two releases and we should have found a few people that are willing/able to help out with the work. If we have not made any progress on the community aspect by then, it may be a good time to reflect on how to gracefully move people over to a plain Karaf/CXF/Camel/... solution instead. Wdyt? Gert Vanthienen
-- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [email protected] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
