Sounds good to me too. Let's give SMX 5 a try :-)
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]>wrote: > L.S., > > > Moving the discussion from the users@ to dev@ mailing list, it would > be good to figure out how to go about things. > > For now, I would propose we avoid adding any extra complexity and just > focus on getting a simple assembly project in place that combines the > latest and greatest bits of ActiveMQ, CXF, Camel, Karaf, ... > > How about we start with the ServiceMix 5 codebase, remove the new > Camel interceptor bits for now and just focus on getting the assembly > itself, the examples and the integration tests working? That way, we > should have a fairly manageable amount of work to perform before we > can get to a new release. > > We have a board report coming up in March, so we can convey this new > direction in that. Perhaps we should use the next board report after > that as a checkpoint to see if we are making any progress: by then, I > think we should have been able to do at least one or two releases and > we should have found a few people that are willing/able to help out > with the work. If we have not made any progress on the community > aspect by then, it may be a good time to reflect on how to gracefully > move people over to a plain Karaf/CXF/Camel/... solution instead. > > > Wdyt? > > Gert Vanthienen > -- Cheers, Jon --------------- Red Hat, Inc. Email: [email protected] Web: http://redhat.com Twitter: jon_anstey Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
