+1 to cut off the new release. I will include the cleanups in 5.0.1.

Thanks again for the job Gert !
Regards
JB

On 03/17/2014 09:09 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
Hi Jean-Baptiste,


I sent out the cancelation notice last evening.  Did you have any
specific changes in mind you wanted to get in?  I just removed the tag
and updated the release notes, so as far as I'm concerned, I'm ready
to start a new release build whenever we think we're ready for it.


Regards,

Gert Vanthienen


On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
Good catch Raul,

I agree, I revert my vote to -1.

As Gert will probably cancel the release, I will include some
patches/cleanup.

Regards
JB


On 03/16/2014 08:49 PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:

Hello,

I did a clean build and started the resulting instance. Unfortunately I
came across this message while starting up:

Please wait while Apache ServiceMix is starting...
Ignoring

/Users/raul/Workbench/apache-servicemix-5.0.0/system/org/apache/karaf/deployer/org.apache.karaf.deployer.wrap/2.3.4/org.apache.karaf.deployer.wrap-2.3.4.jar
(run level must be an integer)

The root cause is that the concatenation of startup.properties from the
Karaf distro with our OBR variant leads to this result:


org/apache/karaf/deployer/org.apache.karaf.deployer.wrap/2.3.4/org.apache.karaf.deployer.wrap-2.3.4.jar=30#
#    Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
#    contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with

Notice the trailing comment pound. Could be due to any or many of several
reasons: Karaf 2.3.4 has removed the trailing at the end of their
startup.properties file or license header was added recently; newlines are
not handled properly after we merged the Windows + Unix distros; etc.

It definitely must be a platform-specific issue, given that the rest of
you
haven't come across it... Did you guys build from scratch? Or did you use
RC binaries to test?

I cannot effectively -1 this candidate since I'm not a committer, but as a
user I would expect SMX5 to provide a seamless and flawless experience. My
2 cent.

P.S.: Working on a patch.

Regards,

*Raúl Kripalani*
Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
Integration specialist
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Gert Vanthienen
<[email protected]>wrote:

L.S.,


We've uploaded a release for Apache ServiceMix 5.0.0 to


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicemix-1004/

An overview of issues fixed in this release can be found in JIRA at
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM/fixforversion/12324078

The scm tag is available on
    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx5/tags/servicemix-5.0.0/

Please vote to approve this release:

[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for 72 hours.


Regards,

Gert Vanthienen



--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to