Sorry I have mixed borh versions. 5.0.x has no problem with the itest. But we should create the separate drools feature On May 13, 2014 3:48 PM, "Krzysztof Sobkowiak" <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > We should add karaf user as workaround for activemq console and apply your > proposal for the camel drools itest problem. > > I'm back on thursday. > > Best regards > Krzysztof > On May 13, 2014 1:42 PM, "Gert Vanthienen" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> L.S., >> >> >> I deferred most of the remaining issues to 5.0.2 - we probably want to >> apply the pull request for separating the drools feature (SM-2288) and >> figure out how we want to handle the problem with the ActiveMQ web >> console (SM-2267), but other than that we are ready to do a 5.0.1 >> release in my mind. >> >> Unless someone has anything else that desperately needs to make it in, >> how about we try to tick off those final 2 little items today and I'll >> cut the release tomorrow? >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Gert Vanthienen >> >
