Hi Krzysztof,
Actually, that was a mistake I made when creating that release JIRA issue, but I wouldn't mind doing that upgrade either. While setting fix versions, I encountered a few issues that would be fixed by ActiveMQ 5.10.0. Contrary to dependencies like Camel where people actually refer to it from their own code, ActiveMQ should be mainly a service that people are using so the upgrade should not be a problem. I'm +1 for upgrading to 5.10.0 in 5.0.4 if that fixes a few things for us. Regards, Gert Vanthienen On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Gert > > Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0? > > Best regards > Krzysztof > > On 28.07.2014 14:11, Gert Vanthienen (JIRA) wrote: >> Gert Vanthienen created SM-2351: >> ----------------------------------- >> >> Summary: Release Apache ServiceMix 5.0.4 >> Key: SM-2351 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2351 >> Project: ServiceMix >> Issue Type: Bug >> Components: assemblies >> Reporter: Gert Vanthienen >> Fix For: 5.0.4 >> >> >> Issue to keep track of the overall progress of the Apache ServiceMix 5.0.4 >> release. >> >> *Major dependency versions* >> || Dependency || Version || Remarks || >> | ActiveMQ | 5.10.0 | | >> | Camel | 2.12.4 | | >> | CXF | 2.7.11 | | >> | Karaf | 2.3.6 | | >> >> *Other information* >> * [JIRA release >> information|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM/fixforversion/12327146] >> * SNAPSHOT downloads available on >> http://servicemix.apache.org/downloads/servicemix-5.0.4.html >> >> >> >> >> -- >> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA >> (v6.2#6252) > > > -- > Krzysztof Sobkowiak > > JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer > @ ASF > Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center > <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw > e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | > Twitter: @KSobkowiak > Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
