We have one problem with the upgrade. ActiveMQ 5.10.x needs Camel 2.13.x
ERROR: Bundle org.apache.servicemix.activemq.camel [193] Error
starting/stopping bundle. (org.osgi.framework.BundleException:
Unresolved constraint in bundle org.apache.servicemix.activemq.camel
[193]: Unable to resolve 193.0: missing requirement [193.0]
osgi.wiring.package;
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.activemq.camel.component)(version>=5.10.0)(!(version>=6.0.0)))
[caused by: Unable to resolve 134.0: missing requirement [134.0]
osgi.wiring.package;
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.camel)(version>=2.13.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))])
org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle
org.apache.servicemix.activemq.camel [193]: Unable to resolve 193.0:
missing requirement [193.0] osgi.wiring.package;
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.activemq.camel.component)(version>=5.10.0)(!(version>=6.0.0)))
[caused by: Unable to resolve 134.0: missing requirement [134.0]
osgi.wiring.package;
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.camel)(version>=2.13.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))]
at
org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.resolveBundleRevision(Felix.java:3826)
at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.startBundle(Felix.java:1868)
at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.setBundleStartLevel(Felix.java:1388)
at
org.apache.felix.framework.FrameworkStartLevelImpl.run(FrameworkStartLevelImpl.java:301)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
So we can not upgrade to 5.10.0
Best regards
Krzysztof
On 28.07.2014 20:09, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
> Yes, I think, the upgrade to 5.10.0 brings more positive changes for
> 5.0.x as negative.
>
> Bets regards
> Krzysztof
>
> On 28.07.2014 16:32, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>>
>> Actually, that was a mistake I made when creating that release JIRA
>> issue, but I wouldn't mind doing that upgrade either. While setting
>> fix versions, I encountered a few issues that would be fixed by
>> ActiveMQ 5.10.0. Contrary to dependencies like Camel where people
>> actually refer to it from their own code, ActiveMQ should be mainly a
>> service that people are using so the upgrade should not be a problem.
>>
>> I'm +1 for upgrading to 5.10.0 in 5.0.4 if that fixes a few things for us.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Gert
>>>
>>> Are we going to upgrade 5.0.x to ActiveMQ 5.10.0?
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>> On 28.07.2014 14:11, Gert Vanthienen (JIRA) wrote:
>>>> Gert Vanthienen created SM-2351:
>>>> -----------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Summary: Release Apache ServiceMix 5.0.4
>>>> Key: SM-2351
>>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2351
>>>> Project: ServiceMix
>>>> Issue Type: Bug
>>>> Components: assemblies
>>>> Reporter: Gert Vanthienen
>>>> Fix For: 5.0.4
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Issue to keep track of the overall progress of the Apache ServiceMix 5.0.4
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> *Major dependency versions*
>>>> || Dependency || Version || Remarks ||
>>>> | ActiveMQ | 5.10.0 | |
>>>> | Camel | 2.12.4 | |
>>>> | CXF | 2.7.11 | |
>>>> | Karaf | 2.3.6 | |
>>>>
>>>> *Other information*
>>>> * [JIRA release
>>>> information|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM/fixforversion/12327146]
>>>> * SNAPSHOT downloads available on
>>>> http://servicemix.apache.org/downloads/servicemix-5.0.4.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer
@ ASF
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
