Nice. org.apache.servicemix.drools it will be better.

So. My proposal

https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/e48a3f21cd598a40b57aa329791bb1a7d79ef435


With separate repository will be difficult maintenance relation between SM
and features in that repository.
For example which project should be released earlier SM or
servicemix-features.

drools-karaf-features have own lifecycle but without relation with SM.
Maybe it's better to do a patch to drools-karaf-features ?


2015-04-14 11:23 GMT+02:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[email protected]>:

> Hi Grzegorz
>
>
> I think, you mean ServiceMix 6.0.0.
>
> It looks good for me. I prefer the modularized version of the feature
> (exactly like it looks now). It is more flexible
> and can be better extended with additional features.
>
> We can eventually create a new maven submodule drools
> (org.apache.servicemix/drools) in ServiceMix. It could contain a
> submodule feature(org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature) containing this
> feature. Your feature would be accessible with ulr:
>
> mvn:org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/feature
>
>
> We can think once (when haveng more such features) about extracting this
> submodule in a separate repository (something
> like servicemix-features) with own lifecycle.
>
> We have already an issue for the new feature
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2497
>
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
>
> On 14.04.2015 10:40, Grzegorz Hałajko wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > I would like to add Drools 6.2 to SerwiceMix 6.2
> >
> > And this is my proposal:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/00e0c8480e0d8f3f46f552e20c5bc44a52be8411
> >
> > New feature will be
> > "mvn:org.apache.servicemix/apache-servicemix/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/drools6"
> >
> > I was inspired by drools-karaf-features but in my version I changed
> > versions in external bundles (e.g. camel , cxf ) to supported in
> > ServiceMix.
> >
> > Also I see another way to create features.xml. One big feature e.g
> drools6
> > with all bundles (kie,drools,jbpm), from projekt  and another three
> > supported camel, spring  and blueprint.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Regards
> > GH
> >
> >
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect
> Apache Software Foundation Member
> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair
> Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <
> http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
>



-- 
Grzegorz Hałajko
tel: +48 784 488 241
gpg: 4096R/CCB9AB0A
<https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF0A21389CCB9AB0A>

Reply via email to