I raised a JIRA issue about SM-163 about different NMR-Flow types within a single ServiceMix container instance.

But my manager is asking me for more details about the current architecture that I am unable to answer :-(

His question to me is "what is the BACKGROUND of the one-flow-per container architecture? eg WHY did they choose this strategy?"

I really have no idea - I figured maybe there is no reason other than it was just the easiest/quickest thing to do for the 1st release....

Anyway I said at least I would pass his question to the dev list.

So if anybody knows the history of the one-flow-type-per-container architecture or some sort of justification for it being this way can you please let me know.

Thanks
Peter.


Reply via email to