On 7/27/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

So, I've got a question for us ... would we be interested (now or later) in
building *a* compatible implementation of this JSR, even though it wouldn't
be *the* RI?  Instead, it would be a feature of Shale in addition to all the
other stuff we do.  I'm pretty intrigued by this, and the ideas that JSR-299
wants to deal with fit pretty nicely with what we've already started.  It
would make sense for us to have this kind of functionality available inside
Shale.

+1 -- Sounds like fun. :)

--
Wendy

Reply via email to