Added. Craig
On 8/3/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
gmail mwessendorf @ gmail DOT com :) On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well the email list is not public atm. That's probably the problem. > We could create a shell gmail account for the svn emails and have that > same account subscribed to the group. Then set up forwarding. That > should work. > > Which brings us to the issue of the list permissions. One option is > to require the moderator approval to join the list (I believe that's > what its set to now.) We could rubber stamp people who want to join > but also remove them if they're acting like assholes. Or just let the > floodgates open. The problem with the open flood gate approach is > that it would be hard to switch back to the other model if we changed > our mind. > > I'm not sure where I stand on this. What does the rest of the group think? > > Sean > > On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Lets think on the package names a bit. > > > > > > OK. > > > > I set up a google group for > > > us. I tried adding the svn commit messages to the group but I'm not > > > sure that's possible. Maybe we just add each "commiter" manually as > > > we go? > > > > > > Hmm ... looks like you have it set up right ... maybe commit mail isn't > > working yet. > > > > It also looks like we can only have one destination address for the commits. > > > > Sean > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Any reason why we can't use org.apache.shale for the package names > > > > > still? I can't really think of a better package name off hand. > > > > > > > > > > > > Using org.apache.shale.xxxxx would seem to create a false perception > > > that > > > > the goodies were actually a formal part of the Shale project, and would > > > > contradict the project description claim in that regard. We should use > > > > "goodies" or "shalegoodies" or something like that. > > > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm ok with shale-goodies as long as we can release artifacts as > > > > > > > different versions, etc. I'm assuming that's the case. I think > > > we're > > > > > > > all curious about the google option so lets go ahead with it. We > > > can > > > > > > > always move it in a few months if it doesn't pan out. Right now > > > > > > > there;s just shale-petstore and it wouldn't be the end of the > > > world to > > > > > > > lose the svn history if we had to move it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I set up a "maven/trunk/master-pom" analogous to what we have in the > > > > > Apache > > > > > > repository ... you could set up shale-petstore/trunk to make it > > > > > > independently branchable and so on. We could even set up a > > > "current" > > > > > > externals later. > > > > > > > > > > > > We'll have to think about the package names (and Maven artifact ids) > > > > > here > > > > > > ... I used "shale-goodies:shale-goodies:1-SNAPSHOT" for the initial > > > > > master > > > > > > pom, but haven't checked in any code yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > my gmail is sean.schofield > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Added. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ps. Google is also doing something cool which is allowing you to > > > host > > > > > > > your domain email through them. There is a beta test going on and > > > > > > > they accepted my application. Something to consider for folks who > > > > > > > have their own domain for business purposes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is pretty cool. > > > > > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
