The only problem with com.google is if we move it from being hosted on google.com (a distinct possibility at this point.)
Sean On 8/4/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I prefer that too. shale.org doesn't appeal to me for some reason I can't really put my finger on. Greg On Aug 4, 2006, at 2:03 PM, James Mitchell wrote: > I prefer com.google.shalegoodies > > Your thoughts? > > > > -- > James Mitchell > 678.910.8017 > > > > > On Aug 4, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Sean Schofield wrote: > >>> > Lets think on the package names a bit. >>> >>> >>> OK. >> >> What about just org.shale? So for petstore we have >> org.shale.petstore >> as the package name with org.shale as the maven group name. >> >>> Craig >> >> Sean > >
