On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like shale-goodies for the group id and shale.goodies for the package name.
+1 Sean Craig On 8/4/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > shale.goodies.petstore ? > > > > > > I like it except for one problem. What is the maven group id? If it > > > starts with shale, people browsing ibiblio might get confused and > > > wonder where the rest of the stuff is? > > > > The Maven groupId would probably be com.google.code.shale-goodies, > > since that's the domain name we "own". > > > > It doesn't necessarily have to match the package name. > > > The group-id in the pom we've been playing with for svn access has a groupId > of "shale-goodies", which seems a good enough identifier for our purposes. > Alternatively, reusing whatever top level package name we choose would also > be fine with me. > > -- > > Wendy > > > > > Craig > >
