On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:21 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > StyleTagProxyEmbeddedUrlsVisitorTest.testImportsAndBackgroundUrlsInStyleTag() > is incorrect. According the W3C CSS2 spec > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/syndata.html#at-rules: CSS 2.1 user agents > must ignore any '@import' rule that occurs inside a block or after any > non-ignored statement other than an @charset or an @import rule.
> I've changed the test case to test what I assume was intended to be > tested (an unignored @import), synced and submitted. > Makes sense. Out of curiosity, caja must be ignoring @import statement after a non ignorable css statement [ which is probably why that test failed :) ] If so, is there a flag asking it to not do so ? It could come in handy if we find a user agent that does not ignore such statements and want to emulate its behavior. > > (Incidentally the submission was made while at 10969m and traveling at > the speed of at 822km/h. Is this a contender for the Shindig patch made > at the greatest height and speed? :) ) Nice ! Travelling in first class eh :) Definitely a solid contestant id say. > > http://codereview.appspot.com/1852041/show >
