Mark,

+1 on this -- oAuth 2.0 support is still pretty new out in the wild but the 
momentum is clearly there. We're starting to experiment with oAuth 2.0 support 
at Jive and will find a way to contribute some experimental patches as we make 
progress.

Thanks,
Matt

On Aug 16, 2010, at 7:40 AM, Mark D Weitzel wrote:

> I'd like to see OpenSocial adopt OAuth 2.0 rather than WRAP. I'd go 
> further and say that a good target for this to happen is OpenSocial 1.1 
> next, which is tentatively scheduled for June/July 2011. This allows us to 
> start building out the implementation now, in shindig extras, and allow 
> that to be the prototype required by the OS dev. process. This also allows 
> the spec and the implementation to rely on an official standard.
> 
> -Mark W.
> 
> 
> 
> From:
> Brian Eaton <[email protected]>
> To:
> [email protected]
> Date:
> 08/13/2010 05:35 PM
> Subject:
> Re: OAuth WRAP client support in Shindig?
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:18 AM, John Hjelmstad <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Generally sounds fine to me. A few thoughts:
>> 
>> 1. Is it expected that WRAP will simply be a subset of OAuth2 or will we
>> require a separate OAuth2 code path?
>> 
> 
> I think that WRAP is a subset of OAuth2, plus some parameter changes.  The
> basic web server flow has seen no fundamental changes.
> 
> 
>> 2. The messaging I've generally heard is that OAuth2 will pretty much
>> completely replace WRAP. In practice I doubt that will be the case in 
> full,
>> which could mean we're stuck supporting barely-used code. Thoughts on 
> this?
>> 
> 
> Could happen.
> 
> 3. Can you give a sense (anecdotal is fine) of how widely used WRAP is 
> these
>> days, ie. the value of supporting it for the code base?
>> 
> 
> Live at Microsoft, and at Google.  Google is not widely documenting our 
> WRAP
> support.  We needed it for a few particular use cases, and it is being
> quietly used there.
> 
> 
>> 4. How much new code do you expect in OAuthRequest, roughly? It seems 
> that
>> class is already getting quite large...
> 
> 
> I think this is the big question.
> 
> The other question is if/when OpenSocial will adopt the OAuth2 crypto
> proposals.  They've been dropped from the core spec due to lack of
> consensus, but I think we did arrive at something that OpenSocial will 
> want
> some day.
> 
> Cheers,
> Brian
> 
> 

Reply via email to