I am +1 for going with OAuth 2.0 instead of WRAP.

Looks like the OAuth WRAP is deprecated in favor of OAuth 2.0:
http://wiki.oauth.net/OAuth-WRAP so might as well spend good quality time
adding support for OAuth 2.0.

- Henry

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Mark D Weitzel <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'd like to see OpenSocial adopt OAuth 2.0 rather than WRAP. I'd go
> further and say that a good target for this to happen is OpenSocial 1.1
> next, which is tentatively scheduled for June/July 2011. This allows us to
> start building out the implementation now, in shindig extras, and allow
> that to be the prototype required by the OS dev. process. This also allows
> the spec and the implementation to rely on an official standard.
>
> -Mark W.
>
>
>
> From:
> Brian Eaton <[email protected]>
> To:
> [email protected]
> Date:
> 08/13/2010 05:35 PM
> Subject:
> Re: OAuth WRAP client support in Shindig?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:18 AM, John Hjelmstad <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Generally sounds fine to me. A few thoughts:
> >
> > 1. Is it expected that WRAP will simply be a subset of OAuth2 or will we
> > require a separate OAuth2 code path?
> >
>
> I think that WRAP is a subset of OAuth2, plus some parameter changes.  The
> basic web server flow has seen no fundamental changes.
>
>
> > 2. The messaging I've generally heard is that OAuth2 will pretty much
> > completely replace WRAP. In practice I doubt that will be the case in
> full,
> > which could mean we're stuck supporting barely-used code. Thoughts on
> this?
> >
>
>  Could happen.
>
> 3. Can you give a sense (anecdotal is fine) of how widely used WRAP is
> these
> > days, ie. the value of supporting it for the code base?
> >
>
> Live at Microsoft, and at Google.  Google is not widely documenting our
> WRAP
> support.  We needed it for a few particular use cases, and it is being
> quietly used there.
>
>
> > 4. How much new code do you expect in OAuthRequest, roughly? It seems
> that
> > class is already getting quite large...
>
>
> I think this is the big question.
>
> The other question is if/when OpenSocial will adopt the OAuth2 crypto
> proposals.  They've been dropped from the core spec due to lack of
> consensus, but I think we did arrive at something that OpenSocial will
> want
> some day.
>
> Cheers,
> Brian
>
>
>

Reply via email to