-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1079/#review1026
-----------------------------------------------------------



trunk/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/js/JsLoadProcessor.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/1079/#comment2105>

    Is the defined http: here intentional? I would have thought that keeping it 
protocol-relative, the same as the document.write() version, would be better.


- Mat


On 2011-07-11 19:04:04, johnfargo wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/1079/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-07-11 19:04:04)
> 
> 
> Review request for shindig.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Allows Boolean configuration value "shindig.jsload.async-mode" to be set. 
> When true, an element.appendChild(srcElem) based approach is taken for 
> &jsload=1 rather than document.write.
> 
> This functionality is not enabled by default.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> trunk/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/js/JsLoadProcessor.java
>  1144361 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1079/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> johnfargo
> 
>

Reply via email to