-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1190/#review1183
-----------------------------------------------------------



http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/content/samplecontainer/examples/media-openGadgets/MediaUIOpenGadgets.js
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/1190/#comment2538>

    Add some comments here that your just demonstrating using this API, it does 
not server any real surpose.



http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/open-views/viewenhancements-container.js
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/1190/#comment2537>

    Small nit, please put brackets around the if else here, it will make it 
easier to read.


- Ryan


On 2011-07-25 22:09:04, Jason Chiang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/1190/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-07-25 22:09:04)
> 
> 
> Review request for shindig and Ryan Baxter.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> 
> 1. Update implementation of gadgets.window.getContainerDimensions based on 
> latest API which will call the callback function with the dimension object as 
> parameter.
> 2. correct the feature signature/docs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/content/samplecontainer/examples/media-openGadgets/MediaUIOpenGadgets.js
>  1150846 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/open-views/viewenhancements-container.js
>  1150848 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/open-views/viewenhancements.js
>  1150848 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/features/src/test/javascript/features/open-views/viewEnhancements-test.js
>  1150704 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1190/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason
> 
>

Reply via email to