> On 2011-09-16 18:47:49, Stanton Sievers wrote:
> > Do you know who is taking the initiative to implement the usage of "method" 
> > in Shindig?

Not sure, its a community project so anyone could just do it.


> On 2011-09-16 18:47:49, Stanton Sievers wrote:
> > trunk/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/spec/LinkSpec.java,
> >  line 74
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/1928/diff/2/?file=41488#file41488line74>
> >
> >     Is there a particular reason getMethod() isn't being added to 
> > GadgetsHandlerApi.LinkSpec?

No reason other than forget cause its too many duplicate classes for different 
purpose =(

I will add it in the code.


- Henry


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1928/#review1936
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2011-09-16 18:16:57, Henry Saputra wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/1928/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-09-16 18:16:57)
> 
> 
> Review request for shindig.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> The <Link> representation LinkSpec class missing "method" optional property 
> as defined in the OpenSocial specs: 
> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/2.0/Core-Gadget.xml#LifeCycleEvents
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SHINDIG-1622.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1622
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> trunk/java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/spec/LinkSpec.java
>  1171202 
>   
> trunk/java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/spec/LinkSpecTest.java
>  1171202 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1928/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Updated the unit test for LinkSpec and pass.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Henry
> 
>

Reply via email to