>-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >Paul Lindner >Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:45 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Monthly Beta Releases > >Happy to train anyone that wants to cut releases. It's a pretty simple >affair. The biggest obstacle may be getting your GPG key signed.
Boston area key signing party? > >On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. ><[email protected]>wrote: > >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: daviesd [mailto:[email protected]] >> >Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:27 AM >> >To: [email protected] >> >Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Monthly Beta Releases >> > >> >I would agree. I'm scared to death with the number of changes that have >> >been >> >made between the beta we are using and the next one. :) >> >> Do you think monthly is the right cadence? >> >> Also, with the increased frequency and Paul's more limited availability, >> would it make sense to have a couple more release managers? At Rave, we >> have started a rotation to reduce some of the burden of spinning releases. >> >> > >> > >> >On 5/18/12 10:06 AM, "Franklin, Matthew B." <[email protected]> >wrote: >> > >> >> There are quite a few of us Shindig users who are unable to depend on >> >SNAPSHOT >> >> releases or trunk code. As great new bug fixes and features rapidly >> make >> >> their way into Shindig, we would like to consume them on a more regular >> >basis. >> >> Therefore, I would like to propose that a beta release is spun on a >> monthly >> >> cadence. >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> >> -Matt >> >> >> > >> >> > > >-- >Paul Lindner -- [email protected] -- profiles.google.com/pmlindner
