http://codereview.appspot.com/6305079/diff/6001/java/social-api/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/social/opensocial/spi/GroupIdTest.java File java/social-api/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/social/opensocial/spi/GroupIdTest.java (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6305079/diff/6001/java/social-api/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/social/opensocial/spi/GroupIdTest.java#newcode43 java/social-api/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/social/opensocial/spi/GroupIdTest.java:43: GroupId unknown = GroupId.fromJson("@foo"); +1 Mike. Doug is there any reason why you would want the test to use @custom? On 2012/06/11 15:35:11, TheMistyMay wrote:
I would disagree, seems misleading to call it @custom. @foo
demonstrates it can
be anything and it not just another hardcoded type.
Works either way but I think @foo is a better representation of the
feature.
On 2012/06/11 13:48:55, DouglasLDavies wrote: > Call the variable custom
http://codereview.appspot.com/6305079/
