So it is going to be a lot of work to update the schema to make it match the spec? I am not attached to samples in this case. I think having proper documentation on how to provide your own implementations is just as valuable as a sample in this case.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am trying to fix the JPA example but even the schema has changed since > the last time any code is committed. Too much work to maintain this module > when OpenSocial specs are moving as fast as it is right now. > > I am proposing to dump this java-samples module because its getting harder > to maintain. We will rely on unit tests and sample app using the JSON > schema. > > - Henry > > > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I don't think so. I get test failures in that project not compile >> errors. Although I just checked in changes for the compiler level to >> move it to 1.6 so you might want to update and try again. >> >> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hmm I got compile erro when tried to run mvn clean test in java/samples >> dir: >> > >> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal >> > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.3.2:testCompile >> > (default-testCompile) on project shindig-samples: Compilation failure >> > [ERROR] >> > >> /Users/hsaputra/shindig/trunk/java/samples/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/social/opensocial/jpa/spi/integration/JpaRestfulTestConfigHelper.java:[83,11] >> > cannot find symbol >> > [ERROR] symbol : method setJSONPAllowed(boolean) >> > [ERROR] location: class org.apache.shindig.protocol.DataServiceServlet >> > [ERROR] -> [Help 1] >> > [ERROR] >> > >> > >> > Is this the same error? >> > >> > - Henry >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Not really a blocker in my opinion, but I felt like we were close to >> >> getting it in so I would at least try to make the effort ;) >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com >> > >> >> wrote: >> >> > Ugh sorry for late reply. No I did not have time to look at it. >> >> > >> >> > I guess it is blocker for 2.5? I will take a look at it later today. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > - Henry >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Henry, have you had a sometime to look into this at all? Would like >> >> >> to get this into 2.5. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Yes I just uploaded the newest patch from my workspace, if you >> have a >> >> >> > chance take a look at the samples module. I am just not familiar >> >> >> > enough with JPA to know what is wrong... >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Henry Saputra < >> >> henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I fixed couple issues before. So the patches for the udpated data >> >> model >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> in that review entry? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I can try it out. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Henry >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Ryan Baxter < >> rbaxte...@apache.org> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Henry I actually have most of the 2 patches integrated together >> [1]. >> >> >> >>> I need to some help with the JPA stuff some of the unit tests are >> >> >> >>> failing, are you familiar with that code at all? >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> [1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/ >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Henry Saputra < >> >> >> henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> > Yeah, I have been distracted with so many items so did not have >> >> time >> >> >> to >> >> >> >>> > finish it =( >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > Do you guys think it is a blocker for 2.5.0 release? >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > - Henry >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Ryan Baxter < >> >> rbaxte...@apache.org> >> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> >> I dont think we have a list of them per-say. Looking through >> the >> >> >> >>> >> JIRAs labeled with 2.5.0 I found SHINDIG-1539 [1] which tries >> to >> >> few >> >> >> >>> >> some gaps in the social data objects. I updated the patch >> from >> >> >> James >> >> >> >>> >> so it builds against trunk and created a review for it [2]. I >> >> think >> >> >> >>> >> SHINDIG-1539 and SHINDIG-1878 are pretty much dups. We should >> >> apply >> >> >> >>> >> one of the reviews and close both of them. I am try and see >> if >> >> >> there >> >> >> >>> >> are differences between the two. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> The other gap I can think of is the External Services section >> in >> >> the >> >> >> >>> >> spec [3]. @Henry weren't you working on a patch for this? >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1539 >> >> >> >>> >> [2] https://reviews.apache.org/r/9990/ >> >> >> >>> >> [3] >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://opensocial-resources.googlecode.com/svn/spec/trunk/Core-Gadget.xml#ExternalServices >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Henry Saputra < >> >> >> >>> henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> > Not exactly, we have using JIRA to capture the differences. >> >> >> Mostly the >> >> >> >>> >> > differences come from the data model where new fields are >> >> >> introduced >> >> >> >>> or >> >> >> >>> >> > have name changes. >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > The big ticket AFAIK is SHINDIG-1878. >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > I am +1 and reccommend for 2.5.0 release. It is been long >> >> overdue >> >> >> and >> >> >> >>> >> > everybody have been putting a lot of good work. >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > Thanks, >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > Henr >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matt Franklin < >> >> >> >>> m.ben.frank...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>> >> >wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Ryan Baxter wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > Hey everyone, >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > 2.5.0-beta6 is out the door (thanks everyone for their >> hard >> >> >> work) >> >> >> >>> and >> >> >> >>> >> >> > I think we are at a point where 2.5.0 is pretty much >> ready >> >> for >> >> >> a >> >> >> >>> >> >> > release. Defects have been slow to come in over the past >> >> few >> >> >> weeks >> >> >> >>> >> >> > and from my point of view things are pretty stable. I >> know >> >> >> there >> >> >> >>> are >> >> >> >>> >> >> > still some gaps between what is implemented in Shindig >> and >> >> >> what is >> >> >> >>> in >> >> >> >>> >> >> > the 2.5.0 OpenSocial spec >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> do we at least have these gaps captured anywhere? >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > but I think it is also important to get a >> >> >> >>> >> >> > non-beta release out there for other projects to consume. >> >> If >> >> >> >>> everyone >> >> >> >>> >> >> > is OK with this our next release will be the official >> 2.5.0 >> >> >> release >> >> >> >>> >> >> > and will not have a beta tag. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > -Ryan >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
