On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Henry I would still like to make an attempt to stay aligned if we can. > > @Matt I don't understand the need for 2.5.1-alphaX, if we branch can't > we just stick with 2.5.1-SNAPSHOT in trunk? Yes. I was assuming we would release at least 2 times before 2.5.1 final. > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Matt Franklin <m.ben.frank...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Aug 5, 2013, at 20:03, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I am actually still +1 for just 2.5.1. We agreed that Shindig version > will > >> adhere to OpenSocial specs up to minor version which in this case is > 2.5.x > > > > What about developing in trunk at 2.5.1-alphaX and branching for fixes > in 2.5.0-update1? > > > > I also think 2.5.1 should be relatively minor in changes to the > software itself. Ideally, only additions and no breaking changes to > existing interfaces, etc. > > > > > >> > >> - Henry > >> > >> > >>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Here is what I found on version numbers [1]. From what I gather after > >>> reading that using 2.5.0.1 would be considered "non-standard". The > >>> only downside to this would be the version numbers would be compared > >>> as strings. We could use 2.5.0-fix1 which would be considered > >>> standard, but I don't think that buys us anything with regards to > >>> version comparison. I could pose a question to the Maven users list > >>> and see if they have any advice. > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > http://books.sonatype.com/mvnref-book/reference/pom-relationships-sect-pom-syntax.html > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Stanton Sievers <ssiev...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>> +1. Shindig-1924 is one such cleanup. I also agree with staying in > line > >>>> with the spec. > >>>> > >>>> I would just want to make sure we have no technical or process issues > >>> with > >>>> maven artifacts (or the like) with 4 numbers in the version. > >>>>> On Aug 5, 2013 7:29 PM, "Ryan Baxter" <rbaxte...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> The current version of trunk is set to 2.5.1. I am wondering what > >>>>> people think of changing that to 2.5.0.1? There are a few cleanup > >>>>> changes that have already been identified that would be good to get > >>>>> out there. At same time we want to stay in sync with the spec > version > >>>>> so I don't think we want to release 2.5.1 yet. What does everyone > >>>>> think? > >>> >
