The next version of Shindig will contain the first release without PHP. I believe that's worth a bump in revision part of the version to 2.5.1.
@Ryan, I would love to keep it in-sync but Shindig will move faster than spec development and it would be hard to keep up with the exact version. I believe other projects like Apache Tomcat and Apache MyFaces (latest release is 2.1.12 that implement JSF 2.1) that also implement open specs follow its release version up to certain levels. I like @Matt's idea, we could release 2.5.1-alphaX releases but final release should be 2.5.1 but branching early to add minor emergency fixes with 2.5.0-update1. - Henry On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Matt Franklin <m.ben.frank...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Aug 5, 2013, at 20:03, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I am actually still +1 for just 2.5.1. We agreed that Shindig version > will > > adhere to OpenSocial specs up to minor version which in this case is > 2.5.x > > What about developing in trunk at 2.5.1-alphaX and branching for fixes in > 2.5.0-update1? > > I also think 2.5.1 should be relatively minor in changes to the software > itself. Ideally, only additions and no breaking changes to existing > interfaces, etc. > > > > > > - Henry > > > > > >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ryan Baxter <rbaxte...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Here is what I found on version numbers [1]. From what I gather after > >> reading that using 2.5.0.1 would be considered "non-standard". The > >> only downside to this would be the version numbers would be compared > >> as strings. We could use 2.5.0-fix1 which would be considered > >> standard, but I don't think that buys us anything with regards to > >> version comparison. I could pose a question to the Maven users list > >> and see if they have any advice. > >> > >> [1] > >> > http://books.sonatype.com/mvnref-book/reference/pom-relationships-sect-pom-syntax.html > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Stanton Sievers <ssiev...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>> +1. Shindig-1924 is one such cleanup. I also agree with staying in line > >>> with the spec. > >>> > >>> I would just want to make sure we have no technical or process issues > >> with > >>> maven artifacts (or the like) with 4 numbers in the version. > >>>> On Aug 5, 2013 7:29 PM, "Ryan Baxter" <rbaxte...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> The current version of trunk is set to 2.5.1. I am wondering what > >>>> people think of changing that to 2.5.0.1? There are a few cleanup > >>>> changes that have already been identified that would be good to get > >>>> out there. At same time we want to stay in sync with the spec version > >>>> so I don't think we want to release 2.5.1 yet. What does everyone > >>>> think? > >> >
